[Jun 05, 2026] 100% Pass Guarantee for PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Dumps with Actual Exam Questions
Today Updated PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Dumps Actual Questions
Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 16
A security engineer has been tasked with protecting a company's on-premises web servers but is not authorized to purchase a web application firewall (WAF).
Which Palo Alto Networks solution will protect the company from SQL injection zero-day, command injection zero-day, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks, and IIS exploits?
- A. Threat Prevention, Advanced URL Filtering, and PAN-OS 10.2 (and higher)
- B. Advanced Threat Prevention and PAN-OS 11.x
- C. Threat Prevention and PAN-OS 11.x
- D. Advanced WildFire and PAN-OS 10.0 (and higher)
Answer: B
Explanation:
Protecting web servers from advanced threats like SQL injection, command injection, XSS attacks, and IIS exploits requires a solution capable of deep packet inspection, behavioral analysis, and inline prevention of zero-day attacks. The most effective solution here isAdvanced Threat Prevention (ATP)combined with PAN-OS 11.x.
* Why "Advanced Threat Prevention and PAN-OS 11.x" (Correct Answer B)?Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) enhances traditional threat prevention by usinginline deep learning modelsto detect and block advanced zero-day threats, includingSQL injection, command injection, and XSS attacks.
With PAN-OS 11.x, ATP extends its detection capabilities to detect unknown exploits without relying on signature-based methods. This functionality is critical for protecting web servers in scenarios where a dedicated WAF is unavailable.
ATP provides the following benefits:
* Inline prevention of zero-day threats using deep learning models.
* Real-time detection of attacks like SQL injection and XSS.
* Enhanced protection for web server platforms like IIS.
* Full integration with the Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW).
* Why not "Threat Prevention and PAN-OS 11.x" (Option A)?Threat Prevention relies primarily on signature-based detection for known threats. While it provides basic protection, it lacks the capability to block zero-day attacks using advanced methods like inline deep learning. For zero-day SQL injection and XSS attacks, Threat Prevention alone is insufficient.
* Why not "Threat Prevention, Advanced URL Filtering, and PAN-OS 10.2 (and higher)" (Option C)?While this combination includes Advanced URL Filtering (useful for blocking malicious URLs associated with exploits), it still relies onThreat Prevention, which is signature-based. This combination does not provide the zero-day protection needed for advanced injection attacks or XSS vulnerabilities.
* Why not "Advanced WildFire and PAN-OS 10.0 (and higher)" (Option D)?Advanced WildFire is focused on analyzing files and executables in a sandbox environment to identify malware. While it is excellent for identifying malware, it is not designed to provide inline prevention for web-based injection attacks or XSS exploits targeting web servers.
NEW QUESTION # 17
According to a customer's CIO, who is upgrading PAN-OS versions, "Finding issues and then engaging with your support people requires expertise that our operations team can better utilize elsewhere on more valuable tasks for the business." The upgrade project was initiated in a rush because the company did not have the appropriate tools to indicate that their current NGFWs were reaching capacity.
Which two actions by the Palo Alto Networks team offer a long-term solution for the customer? (Choose two.)
- A. Suggest the inclusion of training into the proposal so that the operations team is informed andconfident in working on their firewalls.
- B. Inform the CIO that the new enhanced security features they will gain from the PAN-OS upgrades will fix any future problems with upgrading and capacity.
- C. Recommend that the operations team use the free machine learning-powered AIOps for NGFW tool.
- D. Propose AIOps Premium within Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) to address the company's issues from within the existing technology.
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
* Free AIOps for NGFW Tool (Answer A):
* Thefree AIOps for NGFW toolusesmachine learning-powered analyticsto monitor firewall performance, detect potential capacity issues, and provide insights for proactive management.
* This tool helps operations teamsidentify capacity thresholds, performance bottlenecks, and configuration issues, reducing the reliance on manual expertise for routine tasks.
* By using AIOps, the customer can avoid rushed upgrade projects in the future, as the tool providespredictive insights and recommendationsfor capacity planning.
* AIOps Premium within Strata Cloud Manager (Answer D):
* AIOps Premiumis a paid version available within Strata Cloud Manager (SCM), offering more advanced analyticsand proactive monitoring capabilities.
* It helps address operational challenges byautomating workflowsand ensuring thehealth and performance of NGFWs, minimizing the need for constant manual intervention.
* This aligns with the CIO's goal of freeing up the operations team for more valuable business tasks.
* Why Not B:
* While training may help the operations team gain confidence, the long-term focus should be on reducing their manual workload by providingautomated toolslike AIOps. The CIO's concern indicates that relying on manual expertise for ongoing maintenance is not a scalable solution.
* Why Not C:
* Simply informing the CIO about enhanced features from a PAN-OS upgrade does not address the capacity planning issuesor reduce the dependency on the operations team for manual issue resolution.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* AIOps for NGFW Overview
* Strata Cloud Manager and AIOps Integration
NEW QUESTION # 18
The PAN-OS User-ID integrated agent is included with PAN-OS software and comes in which two forms?
(Choose two.)
- A. Windows-based agent
- B. GlobalProtect agent
- C. Integrated agent
- D. Cloud Identity Engine (CIE)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
User-ID is a feature in PAN-OS that maps IP addresses to usernames by integrating with various directory services (e.g., Active Directory). User-ID can be implemented through agents provided by Palo Alto Networks. Here's how each option applies:
* Option A: Integrated agent
* The integrated User-ID agent is built into PAN-OS and does not require an external agent installation. It is configured directly on the firewall and integrates with directory services to retrieve user information.
* This is correct.
* Option B: GlobalProtect agent
* GlobalProtect is Palo Alto Networks' VPN solution and does not function as a User-ID agent.
While it can be used to authenticate users and provide visibility, it is not categorized as a User-ID agent.
* This is incorrect.
* Option C: Windows-based agent
* The Windows-based User-ID agent is a standalone agent installed on a Windows server. It collects user mapping information from directory services and sends it to the firewall.
* This is correct.
* Option D: Cloud Identity Engine (CIE)
* The Cloud Identity Engine provides identity services in a cloud-native manner but isnot a User- ID agent. It synchronizes with identity providers like Azure AD and Okta.
* This is incorrect.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on User-ID
* Knowledge Base article on User-ID Agent Options
NEW QUESTION # 19
Which action can help alleviate a prospective customer's concerns about transitioning from a legacy firewall with port-based policies to a Palo Alto Networks NGFW with application-based policies?
- A. Reassure the customer that the NGFW supports the continued use of port-based rules, as PAN-OS automatically translates these policies into application-based policies.
- B. Recommend deploying a new NGFW firewall alongside the customer's existing port-based firewall until they are comfortable removing the port-based firewall.
- C. Assure the customer that the migration wizard will automatically convert port-based rules to application- based rules upon installation of the new NGFW.
- D. Discuss the PAN-OS Policy Optimizer feature as a means to safely migrate port-based rules to application-based rules.
Answer: D
Explanation:
A: Discuss the PAN-OS Policy Optimizer feature as a means to safely migrate port-based rules to application-based rules.
* PAN-OS includes thePolicy Optimizertool, which helps migrate legacy port-based rules to application- based policies incrementally and safely. This tool identifies unused, redundant, or overly permissive rules and suggests optimized policies based on actual traffic patterns.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
* B:The migration wizard does not automatically convert port-based rules to application-based rules.
Migration must be carefully planned and executed using tools like the Policy Optimizer.
* C:Running two firewalls in parallel adds unnecessary complexity and is not a best practice for migration.
* D:While port-based rules are supported, relying on them defeats the purpose of transitioning to application-based security.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks Policy Optimizer
NEW QUESTION # 20
A systems engineer (SE) successfully demonstrates NGFW managed by Strata Cloud Manager (SCM) to a company. In the resulting planning phase of the proof of value (POV), the CISO requests a test that shows how the security policies are either meeting, or are progressing toward meeting, industry standards such as Critical Security Controls (CSC), and how the company can verify that it is effectively utilizing the functionality purchased.
During the POV testing timeline, how should the SE verify that the POV will meet the CISO's request?
- A. Near the end, pull a Security Lifecycle Review (SLR) in the POV and create a report for the customer.
- B. Near the end, the customer pulls information from these SCM dashboards: Best Practices, CDSS Adoption, and NGFW Feature Adoption.
- C. At the beginning, work with the customer to create custom dashboards and reports for any information required, so reports can be pulled as needed by the customer.
- D. At the beginning, use PANhandler golden images that are designed to align to compliance and to turning on the features for the CDSS subscription being tested.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The SE has demonstrated an NGFW managed by SCM, and the CISO now wants the POV to show progress toward industry standards (e.g., CSC) and verify effective use of purchased features (e.g., CDSS subscriptions like Advanced Threat Prevention). The SE must ensure the POV delivers measurable evidence during the testing timeline. Let's evaluate the options.
Step 1: Understand the CISO's Request
* Industry Standards (e.g., CSC): The Center for Internet Security's Critical Security Controls (e.g., CSC 1: Inventory of Devices, CSC 4: Secure Configuration) require visibility, threat prevention, and policy enforcement, which NGFW and SCM can address.
* Feature Utilization: Confirm that licensed functionalities (e.g., App-ID, Threat Prevention, URL Filtering) are active and effective.
* POV Goal: Provide verifiable progress and utilization metrics within the testing timeline.
Reference: Strata Cloud Manager Overview (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager); CIS Critical Security Controls (www.cisecurity.org/controls).
Step 2: Define SCM Capabilities
Strata Cloud Manager (SCM): A cloud-based management platform for Palo Alto NGFWs, offering dashboards (e.g., Best Practices, Feature Adoption) and custom reporting to monitor security posture, policy compliance, and subscription usage.
Security Lifecycle Review (SLR): A report generated via the Customer Support Portal (not SCM) analyzing traffic logs for security gaps, not real-time POV progress.
Dashboards and Reports: SCM provides prebuilt and customizable views for real-time insights into policy effectiveness and feature adoption.
Reference: SCM Dashboards and Reports (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards-and- reports).
Step 3: Evaluate Each Option
A). Near the end, pull a Security Lifecycle Review (SLR) in the POV and create a report for the customer.
Description: The SLR analyzes 7-30 days of traffic logs, providing a retrospective security posture assessment (e.g., threats blocked, policy gaps).
Process: Near POV end, upload logs to the Customer Support Portal (Support > Security Lifecycle Review), generate, and share the report.
Limitations:
SLR is a point-in-time analysis, not a real-time progress tracker during the POV timeline.
Requires post-POV log collection, delaying feedback.
Doesn't directly show feature utilization progress or CSC alignment in SCM.
Fit: Misses the "during the POV timeline" requirement; better for post-POV analysis.
Reference: Security Lifecycle Review Guide (support.paloaltonetworks.com, requires login).
B). At the beginning, work with the customer to create custom dashboards and reports for any information required, so reports can be pulled as needed by the customer.
Description: SCM allows custom dashboards and reports (Monitor > Dashboards or Reports) tailored to metrics like policy compliance (CSC alignment) and feature usage (e.g., Threat Prevention hits).
Process:
At POV start, collaborate with the CISO to define metrics (e.g., "Threats blocked by ATP" for CSC 6, "App- ID usage" for feature adoption).
Configure custom dashboards in SCM (Dashboards > Add Dashboard > Custom).
Set up scheduled or on-demand reports (Reports > Custom Reports).
Enable the customer to monitor progress throughout the POV.
Benefits:
Real-time visibility into policy effectiveness and feature use during the timeline.
Aligns with CSC (e.g., blocked malware events) and shows subscription ROI.
Empowers the customer to verify results independently.
Fit: Meets the CISO's request fully within the POV timeline.
Reference: SCM Custom Dashboards (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards-and- reports/custom-dashboards).
C). Near the end, the customer pulls information from these SCM dashboards: Best Practices, CDSS Adoption, and NGFW Feature Adoption.
Description: SCM provides prebuilt dashboards:
Best Practices: Assesses policy alignment with security standards.
CDSS Adoption: Tracks subscription usage (e.g., ATP, URL Filtering).
NGFW Feature Adoption: Monitors features like App-ID or User-ID.
Limitations:
Waiting until "near the end" delays visibility, missing ongoing progress tracking.
Prebuilt dashboards may not fully align with CSC or specific customer needs without customization.
Fit: Useful but incomplete; lacks proactive setup and real-time monitoring throughout the POV.
Reference: SCM Prebuilt Dashboards (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards-and- reports/prebuilt-dashboards).
D). At the beginning, use PANhandler golden images that are designed to align to compliance and to turning on the features for the CDSS subscription being tested.
Description: PANhandler is a tool for managing Skillets (configuration templates), including "golden images" for compliance (e.g., NIST, CIS benchmarks).
Process: Apply a Skillet at POV start to configure the NGFW with compliance settings and CDSS features.
Limitations:
Configures the NGFW but doesn't verify progress or utilization during the POV.
No reporting or dashboard integration for the CISO to track results.
Fit: Sets up the environment but doesn't meet the verification requirement.
Reference: PANhandler Skillets (github.com/PaloAltoNetworks/panhandler).
Step 4: Select the Best Approach
B is the strongest choice:
Proactive: Starts at the beginning, ensuring metrics are tracked throughout the POV.
Customizable: Tailors dashboards/reports to CSC (e.g., threat detection for CSC 6) and feature use (e.g., ATP events).
Verifiable: Enables the customer to pull reports as needed, meeting the CISO's request within the timeline.
Why not A, C, or D?
A: SLR is retrospective, not real-time, missing the "during" aspect.
C: Prebuilt dashboards are helpful but delayed and less flexible than custom options.
D: Golden images configure but don't verify progress or utilization.
Step 5: Verification with Palo Alto Documentation
SCM Custom Dashboards: Supports real-time, tailored monitoring (SCM Docs).
SLR: Post-analysis tool, not POV-progressive (Support Portal Docs).
Prebuilt Dashboards: Limited customization (SCM Docs).
PANhandler: Configuration-focused, not reporting-focused (PANhandler Docs).
Thus, the verified answer is B.
NEW QUESTION # 21
What are two methods that a NGFW uses to determine if submitted credentials are valid corporate credentials? (Choose two.)
- A. WMI client probing
- B. Group mapping
- C. Domain credential filter
- D. LDAP query
Answer: B,C
NEW QUESTION # 22
A customer asks a systems engineer (SE) how Palo Alto Networks can claim it does not lose throughput performance as more Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions are enabled on the firewall.
Which two concepts should the SE explain to address the customer's concern? (Choose two.)
- A. Advanced Routing Engine
- B. Management Data Plane Separation
- C. Parallel Processing
- D. Single Pass Architecture
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
* Single Pass Architecture (Answer C):
* Palo Alto Networks firewalls useSingle Pass Architecture, meaning the firewall processes traffic once for all enabled security services.
* This avoids duplicating inspection processes for multiple services like Threat Prevention, URL Filtering, and WildFire.
* With a single traffic inspection pass, the firewall applies all security policies without degrading performance, even as additional CDSS subscriptions are enabled.
* Management Data Plane Separation (Answer D):
* TheManagement PlaneandData Planeare separated on Palo Alto Networks firewalls.
* TheManagement Planehandles configuration, logging, and other administrative tasks, while the Data Planefocuses solely on processing and forwarding traffic.
* This architectural design ensures that enabling additional Cloud-Delivered Security Services does not impact throughput or compromise traffic handling efficiency.
* Why Not Parallel Processing (Answer A):
* While Parallel Processing is beneficial, it is not the main factor in maintaining consistent throughput as more services are enabled. TheSingle Pass Architectureis the key innovation here.
* Why Not Advanced Routing Engine (Answer B):
* The Advanced Routing Engine is not directly related to maintaining throughputwhen enabling CDSS subscriptions. It is more applicable to routing protocols and traffic engineering.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Single Pass Architecture White Paper
* Management and Data Plane Overview
NEW QUESTION # 23
A prospective customer is concerned about stopping data exfiltration, data infiltration, and command-and- control (C2) activities over port 53.
Which subscription(s) should the systems engineer recommend?
- A. DNS Security
- B. Threat Prevention
- C. App-ID and Data Loss Prevention
- D. Advanced Threat Prevention and Advanced URL Filtering
Answer: A
Explanation:
* DNS Security (Answer C):
* DNS Securityis the appropriate subscription for addressingthreats over port 53.
* DNS tunneling is a common method used fordata exfiltration, infiltration, and C2 activities, as it allows malicious traffic to be hidden within legitimate DNS queries.
* The DNS Security service appliesmachine learning modelsto analyze DNSqueries in real-time, block malicious domains, and prevent tunneling activities.
* It integrates seamlessly with the NGFW, ensuring advanced protection against DNS-based threats without requiring additional infrastructure.
* Why Not Threat Prevention (Answer A):
* Threat Prevention is critical for blocking malware, exploits, and vulnerabilities, but it does not specifically addressDNS-based tunnelingor C2 activities over port 53.
* Why Not App-ID and Data Loss Prevention (Answer B):
* While App-ID can identify applications, and Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps prevent sensitive data leakage, neither focuses on blockingDNS tunnelingor malicious activity over port 53.
* Why Not Advanced Threat Prevention and Advanced URL Filtering (Answer D):
* Advanced Threat Prevention and URL Filtering are excellent for broader web and network threats, but DNS tunneling specifically requires theDNS Security subscription, which specializes in DNS-layer threats.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* DNS Security Subscription Overview
NEW QUESTION # 24
A customer claims that Advanced WildFire miscategorized a file as malicious and wants proof, because another vendor has said that the file is benign.
How could the systems engineer assure the customer that Advanced WildFire was accurate?
- A. Do nothing because the customer will realize Advanced WildFire is right.
- B. Review the threat logs for information to provide to the customer.
- C. Use the WildFire Analysis Report in the log to show the customer the malicious actions the file took when it was detonated.
- D. Open a TAG ticket for the customer and allow support engineers to determine the appropriate action.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Advanced WildFire is Palo Alto Networks' cloud-based malware analysis and prevention solution. It determines whether files are malicious by executing them in a sandbox environment and observing their behavior. To address the customer's concern about the file categorization, the systems engineer must provide evidence of the file's behavior. Here's the analysis of each option:
* Option A: Review the threat logs for information to provide to the customer
* Threat logs can provide a summary of events and verdicts for malicious files, but they do not include the detailed behavior analysis needed to convince the customer.
* While reviewing the logs is helpful as a preliminary step, it does not provide the level of proof the customer needs.
* This option is not sufficient on its own.
* Option B: Use the WildFire Analysis Report in the log to show the customer the malicious actions the file took when it was detonated
* WildFire generates an analysis report that includes details about the file's behavior during detonation in the sandbox, such as network activity, file modifications, process executions, and any indicators of compromise (IoCs).
* This report provides concrete evidence to demonstrate why the file was flagged as malicious. It is the most accurate way to assure the customer that WildFire's decision was based on observed malicious actions.
* This is the best option.
* Option C: Open a TAG ticket for the customer and allow support engineers to determine the appropriate action
* While opening a support ticket is a valid action for further analysis or appeal, it isnot a direct way to assure the customer of the current WildFire verdict.
* This option does not directly address the customer's request for immediate proof.
* This option is not ideal.
* Option D: Do nothing because the customer will realize Advanced WildFire is right
* This approach is dismissive of the customer's concerns and does not provide any evidence to support WildFire's decision.
* This option is inappropriate.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on WildFire
* WildFire Analysis Reports
NEW QUESTION # 25
A prospective customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs and wants to evaluate the ability to segregate its internal network into unique BGP environments.
Which statement describes the ability of NGFWs to address this need?
- A. It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it.
- B. It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems.
- C. It can be addressed with BGP confederations.
- D. It cannot be addressed because BGP must be fully meshed internally to work.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Step 1: Understand the Requirement and Context
* Customer Need: Segregate the internal network into unique BGP environments, suggesting multiple isolated or semi-isolated routing domains within a single organization.
* BGP Basics:
* BGP is a routing protocol used to exchange routing information between autonomous systems (ASes).
* eBGP: External BGP, used between different ASes.
* iBGP: Internal BGP, used within a single AS, typically requiring a full mesh of peers unless mitigated by techniques like confederations or route reflectors.
* Palo Alto NGFW: Supports BGP on virtual routers (VRs) within PAN-OS, enabling advanced routing capabilities for Strata hardware firewalls (e.g., PA-Series).
* "PAN-OS supports BGP for dynamic routing and network segmentation" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os
/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
Option A: It cannot be addressed because PAN-OS does not support it
Analysis:
PAN-OS fully supports BGP, including eBGP, iBGP, confederations, and route reflectors, configurable under
"Network > Virtual Routers > BGP."
Features like multiple virtual routers and BGP allow network segregation and routing policy control.
This statement contradicts documented capabilities.
Verification:
"Configure BGP on a virtual router for dynamic routing" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os- networking-admin/bgp/configure-bgp).
Conclusion: Incorrect-PAN-OS supports BGP and segregation techniques. Not Applicable.
Option B: It can be addressed by creating multiple eBGP autonomous systems Analysis:
eBGP: Used between distinct ASes, each with a unique AS number (e.g., AS 65001, AS 65002).
Within a single organization, creating multiple eBGP ASes would require:
Assigning unique AS numbers (public or private) to each internal segment.
Treating each segment as a separate AS, peering externally with other segments via eBGP.
Challenges:
Internally, this isn't practical for a single network-it's more suited to external peering (e.g., with ISPs).
Requires complex management and public/private AS number allocation, not ideal for internal segregation.
Doesn't leverage iBGP or confederations, which are designed for internal AS management.
PAN-OS supports eBGP, but this approach misaligns with the intent of internal network segregation.
Verification:
"eBGP peers connect different ASes" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-networking-admin/bgp
/bgp-concepts).
Conclusion: Possible but impractical and not the intended BGP solution for internal segregation. Not Optimal
NEW QUESTION # 26
Which three use cases are specific to Policy Optimizer? (Choose three.)
- A. Enabling migration from port-based rules to application-based rules
- B. Converting broad rules based on application filters into narrow rules based on application groups
- C. Discovering applications on the network and transitions to application-based policy over time
- D. Discovering 5-tuple attributes that can be simplified to 4-tuple attributes
- E. Automating the tagging of rules based on historical log data
Answer: A,C,E
Explanation:
The question asks for three use cases specific to Policy Optimizer, a feature in PAN-OS designed to enhance security policy management on Palo Alto Networks Strata Hardware Firewalls. Policy Optimizer helps administrators refine firewall rules by leveraging App-ID technology, transitioning from legacy port-based policies to application-based policies, and optimizing rule efficiency. Below is a detailed explanation of why options A, C, and E are the correct use cases, verified against official Palo Alto Networks documentation.
Step 1: Understanding Policy Optimizer in PAN-OS
Policy Optimizer is a tool introduced in PAN-OS 9.0 and enhanced in subsequent versions (e.g., 11.1), accessible under Policies > Policy Optimizer in the web interface. It analyzes traffic logs to:
* Identify applications traversing the network.
* Suggest refinements to security rules (e.g., replacing ports with App-IDs).
* Provide insights into rule usage and optimization opportunities.
Its primary goal is to align policies with Palo Alto Networks' application-centric approach, improving security and manageability on Strata NGFWs.
NEW QUESTION # 27
Which two statements correctly describe best practices for sizing a firewall deployment with decryption enabled? (Choose two.)
- A. Large average transaction sizes consume more processing power to decrypt.
- B. SSL decryption traffic amounts vary from network to network.
- C. Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) certificate authentication method (not the RSA key exchange algorithm) consumes more resources than Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), but ECDSA is more secure.
- D. Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) ephemeral key exchange algorithms such as Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (DHE) and Elliptic-Curve Diffie-Hellman Exchange (ECDHE) consume more processing resources than Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) algorithms.
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
When planning a firewall deployment with SSL/TLS decryption enabled, it is crucial to consider the additional processing overhead introduced by decrypting and inspecting encrypted traffic. Here are the details for each statement:
* Why "SSL decryption traffic amounts vary from network to network" (Correct Answer A)?SSL decryption traffic varies depending on the organization's specific network environment, user behavior, and applications. For example, networks with heavy web traffic, cloud applications, or encrypted VoIP traffic will have more SSL/TLS decryption processing requirements. This variability means each deployment must be properly assessed and sized accordingly.
* Why "Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) ephemeral key exchange algorithms such as Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (DHE) and Elliptic-Curve Diffie-Hellman Exchange (ECDHE) consume more processing resources than Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) algorithms" (Correct Answer C)?PFS algorithms like DHE and ECDHE generate unique session keys for each connection, ensuring better security but requiring significantly more processing power compared to RSA key exchange. When decryption is enabled, firewalls must handle these computationally expensive operations for every encrypted session, impacting performance and sizing requirements.
* Why not "Large average transaction sizes consume more processing power to decrypt" (Option B)?While large transaction sizes can consume additional resources, SSL/TLS decryption is more dependent on the number of sessions and the complexity of the encryption algorithms used, rather than the size of the transactions. Hence, this is not a primary best practice consideration.
* Why not "Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) certificate authentication method consumes more resources than Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA), but ECDSA is more secure" (Option D)?This statement discusses certificate authentication methods, not SSL/TLS decryption performance. While ECDSA is more efficient and secure than RSA, it is not directly relevant to sizing considerations for firewall deployments with decryption enabled.
Reference: Palo Alto Networks SSL Decryption Best Practices outlines considerations for sizing deployments with decryption, including variability in SSL traffic and the impact of encryption algorithms like ECDHE.
NEW QUESTION # 28
What are the first two steps a customer should perform as they begin to understand and adopt Zero Trust principles? (Choose two)
- A. Implement VM-Series NGFWs in the customer's public and private clouds to protect east-west traffic.
- B. Understand which users, devices, infrastructure, applications, data, and services are part of the network or have access to it.
- C. Map the transactions between users, applications, and data, then verify and inspect those transactions.
- D. Enable relevant Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions to automatically protect the customer's environment from both internal and external threats.
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
Zero Trust principles revolve around minimizing trust in the network and verifying every interaction. To adopt Zero Trust, customers should start by gaining visibility and understanding the network and its transactions.
A: Understand which users, devices, infrastructure, applications, data, and services are part of the network or have access to it.
* The first step in adopting Zero Trust is understanding the full scope of the network. Identifying users, devices, applications, and data is critical for building a comprehensive security strategy.
C: Map the transactions between users, applications, and data, then verify and inspect those transactions.
* After identifying all assets, the next step is to map interactions and enforce verification and inspection of these transactions to ensure security.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
* B:Enabling CDSS subscriptions is important for protection but comes after foundational Zero Trust principles are established.
* D:Implementing VM-Series NGFWs is part of enforcing Zero Trust, but it is not the first step.
Visibility and understanding come first.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks Zero Trust Overview
NEW QUESTION # 29
Which three known variables can assist with sizing an NGFW appliance? (Choose three.)
- A. Packet replication
- B. Connections per second
- C. Telemetry enabled
- D. App-ID firewall throughput
- E. Max sessions
Answer: B,D,E
Explanation:
When sizing a Palo Alto Networks NGFW appliance, it's crucial to consider variables that affect its performance and capacity. These include the network's traffic characteristics, application requirements, and expected workloads. Below is the analysis of each option:
* Option A: Connections per second
* Connections per second (CPS) is a critical metric for determining how many new sessions the firewall can handle per second. High CPS requirements are common in environments with high traffic turnover, such as web servers or applications with frequent session terminations and creations.
* This is an important sizing variable.
* Option B: Max sessions
* Max sessions represent the total number of concurrent sessions the firewall can support. For environments with a large number of users or devices, this metric is critical to prevent session exhaustion.
* This is an important sizing variable.
* Option C: Packet replication
* Packet replication is used in certain configurations, such as TAP mode or port mirroring for traffic inspection. While it impacts performance, it is not a primary variable for firewall sizing as it is a specific use case.
* This is not a key variable for sizing.
* Option D: App-ID firewall throughput
* App-ID throughput measures the firewall's ability to inspect traffic and apply policies based on application signatures. It directly impacts the performance of traffic inspection under real-world conditions.
* This is an important sizing variable.
* Option E: Telemetry enabled
* While telemetry provides data for monitoring and analysis, enabling it does not significantly impact the sizing of the firewall. It is not a core variable for determining firewall performance or capacity.
* This is not a key variable for sizing.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Firewall Sizing Guidelines
* Knowledge Base article on Performance and Capacity Sizing
NEW QUESTION # 30
Device-ID can be used in which three policies? (Choose three.)
- A. SD-WAN
- B. Security
- C. Decryption
- D. Policy-based forwarding (PBF)
- E. Quality of Service (QoS)
Answer: B,D,E
Explanation:
Device-ID is a feature in Palo Alto Networks firewalls that identifies devices based on their unique attributes (e.g., MAC addresses, device type, operating system). Device-ID can be used in several policy types to provide granular control. Here's how it applies to each option:
* Option A: Security
* Device-ID can be used in Security policies to enforce rules based on the device type or identity.
For example, you can create policies that allow or block traffic for specific device types (e.g., IoT devices).
* This is correct.
* Option B: Decryption
* Device-ID cannot be used in decryption policies. Decryption policies are based on traffic types, certificates, and other SSL/TLS attributes, not device attributes.
* This is incorrect.
* Option C: Policy-based forwarding (PBF)
* Device-ID can be used in PBF policies to control the forwarding of traffic based on the identified device. For example, you can route traffic from certain device types through specific ISPs or VPN tunnels.
* This is correct.
* Option D: SD-WAN
* SD-WAN policies use metrics such as path quality (e.g., latency, jitter) and application information for traffic steering. Device-ID is not a criterion used in SD-WAN policies.
* This is incorrect.
* Option E: Quality of Service (QoS)
* Device-ID can be used in QoS policies to apply traffic shaping or bandwidth control for specific devices. For example, you can prioritize or limit bandwidth for traffic originating from IoT devices or specific endpoints.
* This is correct.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Device-ID
NEW QUESTION # 31
Which two files are used to deploy CN-Series firewalls in Kubernetes clusters? (Choose two.)
- A. PAN-CN-MGMT
- B. PAN-CNI-MULTUS
- C. PAN-CN-NGFW-CONFIG
- D. PAN-CN-MGMT-CONFIGMAP
Answer: A,D
Explanation:
The CN-Series firewalls are Palo Alto Networks' containerized Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFWs) designed to secure Kubernetes clusters. Unlike the Strata Hardware Firewalls (e.g., PA-Series), which are physical appliances, the CN-Series is a software-based solution deployed within containerized environments.
The question focuses on the specific files used to deploy CN-Series firewalls in Kubernetes clusters. Based on Palo Alto Networks' official documentation, the two correct files are PAN-CN-MGMT-CONFIGMAP and PAN-CN-MGMT. Below is a detailed explanation of why these files are essential, with references to CN- Series deployment processes (noting that Strata hardware documentation is not directly applicable here but is contextualized for clarity).
Step 1: Understanding CN-Series Deployment in Kubernetes
The CN-Series firewall consists of two primary components: the CN-MGMT (management plane) and the CN-NGFW (data plane). These components are deployed as containers in a Kubernetes cluster, orchestrated using YAML configuration files. The deployment process involves defining resources such as ConfigMaps, Pods, and Services to instantiate and manage the CN-Series components. The files listed in the question are Kubernetes manifests or configuration files used during this process.
* CN-MGMT Role:The CN-MGMT container handles the management plane, providing configuration, logging, and policy enforcement for the CN-Series firewall. It requires a dedicated YAML file to define its deployment.
* CN-NGFW Role:The CN-NGFW container handles the data plane, inspecting traffic within the Kubernetes cluster. It relies on configurations provided by CN-MGMT and additional networking setup (e.g., via CNI plugins).
* ConfigMaps:Kubernetes ConfigMaps store configuration data separately from container images, making them critical for passing settings to CN-Series components.
NEW QUESTION # 32
A company with Palo Alto Networks NGFWs protecting its physical data center servers is experiencing a performance issue on its Active Directory (AD) servers due to high numbers of requests and updates the NGFWs are placing on the servers. How can the NGFWs be enabled to efficiently identify users without overloading the AD servers?
- A. Configure Cloud Identity Engine to learn the users' IP address-user mappings from the AD authentication logs.
- B. Configure an NGFW as a GlobalProtect gateway, then have all users run GlobalProtect Windows SSO to gather user information.
- C. Configure data redistribution to redistribute IP address-user mappings from a hub NGFW to the other spoke NGFWs.
- D. Configure an NGFW as a GlobalProtect gateway, then have all users run GlobalProtect agents to gather user information.
Answer: A
Explanation:
When high traffic from Palo Alto Networks NGFWs to Active Directory servers causes performance issues, optimizing the way NGFWs gather user-to-IP mappings is critical. Palo Alto Networks offers multiple ways to collect user identity information, and Cloud Identity Engine provides a solution that reduces the load on AD servers while still ensuring efficient and accurate mapping.
* Option A (Correct): Cloud Identity Engine allows NGFWs to gather user-to-IP mappings directly from Active Directory authentication logs or other identity sources without placing heavy traffic on the AD servers. By leveraging this feature, the NGFW can offload authentication-related tasks and efficiently identify users without overloading AD servers. This solution is scalable and minimizes the overhead typically caused by frequent User-ID queries to AD servers.
* Option B: Using GlobalProtect Windows SSO to gather user information can add complexity and is not the most efficient solution for this problem. It requires all users to install GlobalProtect agents, which may not be feasible in all environments and can introduce operational challenges.
* Option C: Data redistribution involves redistributing user-to-IP mappings from one NGFW (hub) to other NGFWs (spokes). While this can reduce the number of queries sent to AD servers, it assumes the mappings are already being collected from AD servers by the hub, which means the performance issue on the AD servers would persist.
* Option D: Using GlobalProtect agents to gather user information is a valid method for environments where GlobalProtect is already deployed, but it is not the most efficient or straightforward solution for the given problem. It also introduces dependencies on agent deployment, configuration, and management.
How to Implement Cloud Identity Engine for User-ID Mapping:
* Enable Cloud Identity Engine from the Palo Alto Networks console.
* Integrate the Cloud Identity Engine with the AD servers to allow it to retrieve authentication logs directly.
* Configure the NGFWs to use the Cloud Identity Engine for User-ID mappings instead of querying the AD servers directly.
* Monitor performance to ensure the AD servers are no longer overloaded, and mappings are being retrieved efficiently.
References:
Cloud Identity Engine Overview: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/cloud-identity User-ID Best Practices: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com
NEW QUESTION # 33
In which two locations can a Best Practice Assessment (BPA) report be generated for review by a customer?
(Choose two.)
- A. AIOps
- B. Customer Support Portal
- C. PANW Partner Portal
- D. Strata Cloud Manager (SCM)
Answer: A,D
Explanation:
Step 1: Understand the Best Practice Assessment (BPA)
* Purpose: The BPA assesses NGFW (e.g., PA-Series) and Panorama configurations against best practices, including Center for Internet Security (CIS) Critical Security Controls, to enhance security and feature adoption.
* Process: Requires a Tech Support File (TSF) upload or telemetry data from onboarded devices to generate the report.
* Evolution: Historically available via the Customer Support Portal, the BPA has transitioned to newer platforms like AIOps and Strata Cloud Manager.
* References: "BPA measures security posture against best practices" (paloaltonetworks.com, Best Practice Assessment Overview).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
Option A: PANW Partner Portal
* Description: The Palo Alto Networks Partner Portal is a platform for partners (e.g., resellers, distributors) to access tools, resources, and customer-related services.
* BPA Capability:
* Historically, partners could generate BPAs on behalf of customers via the Customer Success Portal (accessible through Partner Portal integration), but this was not a direct customer-facing feature.
* As of July 17, 2023, the BPA generation capability in the Customer Support Portal and related partner tools was disabled, shifting focus to AIOps and Strata Cloud Manager.
* Partners can assist customers with BPA generation but cannot directly generate reports for customer review in the Partner Portal itself; customers must access reports via their own interfaces (e.g., AIOps).
* Verification:
* "BPA transitioned to AIOps; Customer Support Portal access disabled after July 17, 2023" (live.
paloaltonetworks.com, BPA Transition Announcement, 07-10-2023).
* No current documentation supports direct BPA generation in the Partner Portal for customer review.
* Conclusion: Not a customer-accessible location for generating BPAs.Not Applicable.
Option B: Customer Support Portal
* Description: The Customer Support Portal (support.paloaltonetworks.com) provides customers with tools, case management, and historically, BPA generation.
* BPA Capability:
* Prior to July 17, 2023, customers could upload a TSF under "Tools > Best Practice Assessment" to generate a BPA report (HTML, XLSX, PDF formats).
* Post-July 17, 2023, this functionality was deprecated in favor of AIOps and Strata Cloud Manager. Historical BPA data was maintained until December 31, 2023, but new report generation ceased.
* As of March 08, 2025, the Customer Support Portal no longer supports BPA generation, though it remains a support hub.
* Verification:
* "TSF uploads for BPA in Customer Support Portal disabled after July 17, 2023" (docs.
paloaltonetworks.com/panorama/10-2/panorama-admin/panorama-best-practices).
* "Transition to AIOps for BPA generation" (live.paloaltonetworks.com, BPA Transition to AIOps,
07-10-2023).
* Conclusion: No longer a valid location for BPA generation as of the current date.Not Applicable.
Option C: AIOps
* Description: AIOps for NGFW is an AI-powered operations platform for managing Strata NGFWs and Panorama, offering real-time insights, telemetry-based monitoring, and BPA generation.
* BPA Capability:
* Supports two BPA generation methods:
* On-Demand BPA: Customers upload a TSF (PAN-OS 9.1 or higher) via "Dashboards > On Demand BPA" to generate a report, even without telemetry or onboarding.
* Continuous BPA: For onboarded devices with telemetry enabled (PAN-OS 10.0+), AIOps provides ongoing best practice assessments via the Best Practices dashboard.
* Available in free and premium tiers; the free tier includes BPA generation.
* Reports include detailed findings, remediation steps, and adoption summaries.
* Use Case: Ideal for customers managing firewalls with or without full AIOps integration.
* Verification:
* "Generate on-demand BPA reports by uploading TSFs in AIOps" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com
/aiops/aiops-for-ngfw/dashboards/on-demand-bpa).
* "AIOps Best Practices dashboard assesses configurations continuously" (live.paloaltonetworks.
com, AIOps On-Demand BPA, 10-25-2022).
* Conclusion: A current, customer-accessible location for BPA generation.Applicable.
Option D: Strata Cloud Manager (SCM)
* Description: Strata Cloud Manager is a unified, AI-powered management interface for NGFWs and SASE, integrating AIOps, digital experience management, and configuration tools.
* BPA Capability:
* Supports on-demand BPA generation by uploading a TSF under "Dashboards > On Demand BPA," similar to AIOps, for devices not sending telemetry or not fully onboarded.
* For onboarded devices, provides real-time best practice checks via the "Best Practices" dashboard, analyzing policies against Palo Alto Networks and CIS standards.
* Available in Essentials (free) and Pro (paid) tiers; BPA generation is included in both.
* Use Case: Offers a modern, centralized platform for customers to manage and assess security posture.
* Verification:
* "Run BPA directly from Strata Cloud Manager with TSF upload" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com
/strata-cloud-manager/dashboards/on-demand-bpa, 07-24-2024).
* "Best Practices dashboard measures posture against guidance" (paloaltonetworks.com, Strata Cloud Manager Overview).
* Conclusion: A current, customer-accessible location for BPA generation.Applicable.
Step 3: Select the Two Valid Locations
* C (AIOps): Supports both on-demand (TSF upload) and continuous BPA generation, accessible to customers via the Palo Alto Networks hub.
* D (Strata Cloud Manager): Provides identical on-demand BPA capabilities and real-timeassessments, designed as a unified management interface.
* Why Not A or B?
* A (PANW Partner Portal): Partner-focused, not a direct customer tool for BPA generation.
* B (Customer Support Portal): Deprecated for BPA generation post-July 17, 2023; no longer valid as of March 08, 2025.
Step 4: Verified References
* AIOps BPA: "On-demand BPA in AIOps via TSF upload" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/aiops/aiops-for- ngfw/dashboards/on-demand-bpa).
* Strata Cloud Manager BPA: "Generate BPA reports in SCM" (docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata- cloud-manager/dashboards/on-demand-bpa).
* Customer Support Portal Transition: "BPA moved to AIOps/SCM; CSP access ended July 17, 2023" (live.paloaltonetworks.com, BPA Transition, 07-10-2023).
NEW QUESTION # 34
What would make a customer choose an on-premises solution over a cloud-based SASE solution for their network?
- A. The need to enable business to securely expand its geographical footprint.
- B. Hybrid work and cloud adoption at various locations that have different requirements per site.
- C. High growth phase with existing and planned mergers, and with acquisitions being integrated.
- D. Most employees and applications in close physical proximity in a geographic region.
Answer: D
Explanation:
SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) is a cloud-based solution that combines networking and security capabilities to address modern enterprise needs. However, there are scenarios where an on-premises solution is more appropriate.
A: High growth phase with existing and planned mergers, and with acquisitions being integrated.
This scenario typically favors a SASE solution since it provides flexible, scalable, and centralized security that is ideal for integrating newly acquired businesses.
B: Most employees and applications in close physical proximity in a geographic region.
This scenario supports the choice of an on-premises solution. When employees and applications are concentrated in a single geographic region, traditional on-premises firewalls and centralized security appliances provide cost-effective and efficient protection without the need for distributed, cloud-based infrastructure.
C: Hybrid work and cloud adoption at various locations that have different requirements per site.
This scenario aligns with a SASE solution. Hybrid work and varying site requirements are better addressed by SASE's ability to provide consistent security policies regardless of location.
D: The need to enable business to securely expand its geographical footprint.
Expanding into new geographic areas benefits from the scalability and flexibility of a SASE solution, which can deliver consistent security globally without requiring physical appliances at each location.
Key Takeaways:
* On-premises solutions are ideal for geographically concentrated networks with minimal cloud adoption.
* SASE is better suited for hybrid work, cloud adoption, and distributed networks.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks SASE Overview
* On-Premises vs. SASE Deployment Guide
NEW QUESTION # 35
What are two methods that a NGFW uses to determine if submitted credentials are valid corporate credentials? (Choose two.)
- A. WMI client probing
- B. Group mapping
- C. Domain credential filter
- D. LDAP query
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
* LDAP Query (Answer B):
* Palo Alto Networks NGFWs can queryLDAP directories(such as Active Directory) to validate whether submitted credentials match the corporate directory.
* Domain Credential Filter (Answer C):
* TheDomain Credential Filterfeature ensures that submitted credentials are checked against valid corporate credentials, preventing credential misuse.
* Why Not A:
* Group mappingis used to identify user groups for policy enforcement but does not validate submitted credentials.
* Why Not D:
* WMI client probingis used for user identification but is not a method for validating submitted credentials.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Credential Theft Prevention
NEW QUESTION # 36
A company has multiple business units, each of which manages its own user directories and identity providers (IdPs) with different domain names. The company's network security team wants to deploy a shared GlobalProtect remote access service for all business units to authenticate users to each business unit's IdP.
Which configuration will enable the network security team to authenticate GlobalProtect users to multiple SAML IdPs?
- A. GlobalProtect with multiple authentication profiles for each SAML IdP
- B. Authentication sequence that has multiple authentication profiles using different authentication methods
- C. Multiple Cloud Identity Engine tenants for each business unit
- D. Multiple authentication mode Cloud Identity Engine authentication profile for use on the GlobalProtect portals and gateways
Answer: A
Explanation:
To configure GlobalProtect to authenticate users from multiple SAML identity providers (IdPs), the correct approach involves creating multiple authentication profiles, one for each IdP. Here's the analysis of each option:
* Option A: GlobalProtect with multiple authentication profiles for each SAML IdP
* GlobalProtect allows configuring multiple SAML authentication profiles, each corresponding to a specific IdP.
* These profiles are associated with the GlobalProtect portal or gateway. When users attempt to authenticate, they can be directed to the appropriate IdP based on their domain or other attributes.
* This is the correct approach to enable authentication for users from multiple IdPs.
* Option B: Multiple authentication mode Cloud Identity Engine authentication profile for use on the GlobalProtect portals and gateways
* The Cloud Identity Engine (CIE) can synchronize identities from multiple directories, but it does not directly support multiple SAML IdPs for a shared GlobalProtect setup.
* This option is not applicable.
* Option C: Authentication sequence that has multiple authentication profiles using different authentication methods
* Authentication sequences allow multiple authentication methods (e.g., LDAP, RADIUS, SAML) to be tried in sequence for the same user, but they are not designed for handling multiple SAML IdPs.
* This option is not appropriate for the scenario.
* Option D: Multiple Cloud Identity Engine tenants for each business unit
* Deploying multiple CIE tenants for each business unit adds unnecessary complexity and is not required for configuring GlobalProtect to authenticate users to multiple SAML IdPs.
* This option is not appropriate.
NEW QUESTION # 37
In addition to Advanced DNS Security, which three Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions utilize inline machine learning (ML)? (Choose three)
- A. Advanced URL Filtering
- B. Advanced WildFire
- C. Advanced Threat Prevention
- D. IoT Security
- E. Enterprise DLP
Answer: A,C,E
Explanation:
To answer this question, let's analyze each Cloud-Delivered Security Service (CDSS) subscription and its role in inline machine learning (ML). Palo Alto Networks leverages inline ML capabilities across several of its subscriptions to provide real-time protection against advanced threats and reduce the need for manual intervention.
A: Enterprise DLP (Data Loss Prevention)
Enterprise DLP is a Cloud-Delivered Security Service that prevents sensitive data from being exposed. Inline machine learning is utilized to accurately identify and classify sensitive information in real-time, even when traditional data patterns or signatures fail to detect them. This service integrates seamlessly with Palo Alto firewalls to mitigate data exfiltration risks by understanding content as it passes through the firewall.
B: Advanced URL Filtering
Advanced URL Filtering uses inline machine learning to block malicious URLs in real-time. Unlikelegacy URL filtering solutions, which rely on static databases, Palo Alto Networks' Advanced URL Filtering leverages ML to identify and stop new malicious URLs that have not yet been categorized in static databases.
This proactive approach ensures that organizations are protected against emerging threats like phishing and malware-hosting websites.
C: Advanced WildFire
Advanced WildFire is a cloud-based sandboxing solution designed to detect and prevent zero-day malware.
While Advanced WildFire is a critical part of Palo Alto Networks' security offerings, it primarily uses static and dynamic analysis rather than inline machine learning. The ML-based analysis in Advanced WildFire happens after a file is sent to the cloud for processing, rather than inline, so it does not qualify under this question's scope.
D: Advanced Threat Prevention
Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) uses inline machine learning to analyze traffic in real-time and block sophisticated threats such as unknown command-and-control (C2) traffic. This service replaces the traditional Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) approach by actively analyzing network traffic and blocking malicious payloads inline. The inline ML capabilities ensure ATP can detect and block threats that rely on obfuscation and evasion techniques.
E: IoT Security
IoT Security is focused on discovering and managing IoT devices connected to the network. While this service uses machine learning for device behavior profiling and anomaly detection, it does not leverage inline machine learning for real-time traffic inspection. Instead, it operates at a more general level by providing visibility and identifying device risks.
Key Takeaways:
* Enterprise DLP, Advanced URL Filtering, and Advanced Threat Prevention all rely on inline machine learning to provide real-time protection.
* Advanced WildFire uses ML but not inline; its analysis is performed in the cloud.
* IoT Security applies ML for device management rather than inline threat detection.
NEW QUESTION # 38
......
PSE-Strata-Pro-24 exam dumps with real Palo Alto Networks questions and answers: https://dumpstorrent.dumpsking.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24-testking-dumps.html
